dbskyler: (this is a fake)
[personal profile] dbskyler
When I was a teen, I was a HUGE fan of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings books. I could reel off Elven poetry (and Bilbo Baggins poetry), and I don't know how many times I re-read them, but it must have been around seventy-umptillion.

I know that for a fact, because when I saw the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy, I noticed every single little detail that was different from what had happened in the books, even though it had been years since I'd read them.

Okay, perhaps I didn't notice *every* different detail. After all, how would I know what I didn't notice? But I do know that I noticed a LOT of discrepancies, and I also know that they severely detracted from my enjoyment of the movies. Perhaps it's a case of being too much of a fan to be a fan? I don't know. I didn't go in with a "this better be an exact dramatization of the books" mindset, but I noticed the discrepancies. They just kept hitting me over the head, and every time it took me right out of the movie experience. So overall, I didn't find the movie trilogy very enjoyable.

Now I'm worried about the exact same thing happening with the new Hobbit movie. Of course, they apparently are purposely putting in a lot of stuff that wasn't even included in the book -- how else could they get it to 3 cashboxes of movies? -- and I don't know, maybe it won't bother me at all to see dramatization of new stuff. But out of curiosity I went and read Wikipedia's entry on the movie -- I want to know what I'll be getting into if I see it -- and already I find myself getting annoyed at the little plot points that were mentioned that aren't correct. For example, according to Wikipedia (which perhaps is wrong), Bilbo is the one who keeps the trolls arguing until sunrise. NO, it was GANDALF who did that. Also, there is apparently this whole new conflict with Orcs that hits them before they even get to Rivendell. What??? WRONG, that is WRONG!!!! And apparently the movie ends before they even get to Mirkwood, which is . . . well, annoying, but not unexpected (see stretching-one-book-out-to-3-movies).

If I'm going to get this annoyed at the Wikipedia entry, I suspect I will get even more annoyed at the movie. But then I'll feel culturally left out if I don't go to see it. On the other hand, at least I know what happens. Or at least, what's supposed to happen . . .

"FAIRLY", yeah

Date: 2012-12-19 06:57 pm (UTC)
lolmac: (Hands Off)
From: [personal profile] lolmac
Maybe that's "fairly faithful" as in "It only sleeps around on Tuesdays and Thursdays, it's in an open relationship, and it uses birth control"? Oh, wait, no birth control, since it's going to have two more movies.

Or maybe that's "fairly faithful" in contrast to, say, the Earthsea movie (which had characters who had the same names as the ones in the book, and that was about it).

Re: "FAIRLY", yeah

Date: 2012-12-19 07:00 pm (UTC)
ext_3965: (Harry Is Not Impressed!)
From: [identity profile] persiflage-1.livejournal.com
*snorts*

Yeah - Earthsea's something else I haven't watched. Couldn't bring myself to do it.

Profile

dbskyler: (Default)
dbskyler

November 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags