Entry tags:
why the British are better
I'm American. I grew up on American television, and for the most part, I like American television. (I am, of course, not including Jersey Shore, Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, or Fox News in my definition of American television, under the very good justification that they are huge embarrassments and thus hopefully a secret plot by the Canadians to make us look bad.)
However, I recently tried to watch some of the American version of Top Gear, and it was terrible. The most terrible thing about it was that you could tell how hard they were trying while failing utterly. The challenges were the same as the British version. The graphics and music were the same. The camera angles were the same. But it was terrible, and all because of one simple fact: the American version did not feature Jeremy Clarkson, or Richard Hammond, or James May. It featured three Americans who were not interesting, not entertaining, and actually cringe-inducing in their attempts to be both.
Here's the thing, American TV: Sometimes you get it very, very right. Big Bang Theory. The Daily Show. Quark. (Yes, that was a brilliant show! Brilliant!) But sometimes you seem to think that you can buy a formula and put any three jerks in front of the camera and still have a good show. You are wrong.
Try again. Get some hosts with personality and interpersonal chemistry. And realize that ultimately, Top Gear is no more about the cars than Fox News is about news reporting. If you have trouble telling the difference, Jon Stewart can straighten it out for you.
However, I recently tried to watch some of the American version of Top Gear, and it was terrible. The most terrible thing about it was that you could tell how hard they were trying while failing utterly. The challenges were the same as the British version. The graphics and music were the same. The camera angles were the same. But it was terrible, and all because of one simple fact: the American version did not feature Jeremy Clarkson, or Richard Hammond, or James May. It featured three Americans who were not interesting, not entertaining, and actually cringe-inducing in their attempts to be both.
Here's the thing, American TV: Sometimes you get it very, very right. Big Bang Theory. The Daily Show. Quark. (Yes, that was a brilliant show! Brilliant!) But sometimes you seem to think that you can buy a formula and put any three jerks in front of the camera and still have a good show. You are wrong.
Try again. Get some hosts with personality and interpersonal chemistry. And realize that ultimately, Top Gear is no more about the cars than Fox News is about news reporting. If you have trouble telling the difference, Jon Stewart can straighten it out for you.
no subject
Except for science fiction, I gave up on American TV in the early 90s. Unfortunately science fiction has always been the social black sheep of our culture. I've never understood why The Sopranos is acceptable water cooler talk, but Stargate is not.
However, as badly as I think of American TV and as much as I love British TV, I have discovered that the British are hiding skeletons in their closet. Last year I was visiting a friend who moved from here to London and she pointed out that the UK has plenty of horrible television, they are just smart enough to not push it out onto the rest of the world. She turned on the TV and showed me something called Geordie Shores. Granted, it is a take off on Jersey Shores, but it is WAAAAAYY worse than any TV crimes we've committed over here.
no subject
Top Gear is no more about the cars than Fox News is about news reporting
Snerk! You are my hero!
no subject
Aw, shame it's not any good. I could imagine there would be quite a few fun things you could do with a US version. And, ha, yes, EVerybody has filler Tv of some sort or other - you only get mostly the good stuff exported or imported about.
:-)
no subject
no subject
Yeah, I've never understood that either.
it is WAAAAAYY worse than any TV crimes we've committed over here.
I shudder to think how bad it must be, then!
no subject
no subject
no subject
But I guess they're really ours then. Sigh.
no subject
But, yeah, sometimes it seems to miss the point of how much success is dependent on a specific combination of actors and writers in a way you can't reproduce at all.